Questions tagged [feature-request]
You have an idea for a new feature, or for a change to the existing functionality.
44
questions
0
votes
1answer
88 views
How can I best ask ontological engineering questions?
I try to bring up things such as the incoherence of trying to construct the notion of a set containing itself from the perspective of ontological engineering and get voted down on a non-ontological ...
2
votes
0answers
76 views
Vote-to-close reasons
I never exercise my vtc
And then this question came along and I did.
And was disappointed to find no reason strong enough – I wanted to say "Because you're bullshitting". Evidently you cant.
...
2
votes
3answers
49 views
Can we have a Frequently Asked Philosophical Questions Meta post?
There are recurring philosophical questions that generate duplicates, as well as "basic" philosophical questions that are often being asked in the SE. There are Meta questions that discuss this (...
3
votes
2answers
145 views
Should downvotes have explanations?
Firstly I know this is beating a dead horse. I'm not even going to link all the previous discussions. They are easy to find. But I would draw attention to a scenario presented to me by this: https://...
1
vote
0answers
48 views
Can we add a new description to the “off-topic because” list?
I just noticed Joseph close a question What can suffice as a scientific proof for God? to what domain can such a proof belong to? as "not constructive" with an excellent description:
As it ...
1
vote
1answer
46 views
Do edits really need to bump a post in the “active tab”?
A few minutes ago I changed one word in an answer from years ago and I noticed the post (which was closed, in fact) was bumped to the top of the active tab. Is that something that's really desirable ...
6
votes
0answers
66 views
Should we have a chat box linking to the Symposium?
Many custom pages like SciFi & Fantasy have chatrooms permanently linked directly in their sidebar.
As not many of you will remember, we actually do have a general chatroom in philosophy as well: ...
0
votes
0answers
43 views
Make “move conversation to chat” easier from the very beginning of the discussion
When a discussion starts in the comments, it's not easy to open a chat room and copy all the comments to it. It's easier to wait for that message about "moving the conversation to chat", that does ...
5
votes
0answers
65 views
Can questions with “Quantum”, “Entanglement”, “Wave function” and “Superposition” go straight to a moderator for review?
I'm noticing that questions that involve lots of QM jargon tend to also be very poor and subjective, and seem to be adding to the overall noise level on the site. Is there a way that such questions ...
3
votes
1answer
44 views
When will Philosophy.stackexchange get a custom frontpage?
Are we still on beta? Most sites of the network have a custom design, which they got when they were out of beta.
-1
votes
3answers
215 views
Can we remove “theology” from the scope of philosophy.SE?
The SE communities already include Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam and there is even a Biblical Hermeneutics community. Anyone posting theological questions can consult those communities.
...
1
vote
1answer
42 views
migration suggestions missing?
Didn't there used to be an option to add the url of a more appropriate forum for a question to be asked in? What is the procedure for suggesting a more appropriate forum? If there is not an option to ...
4
votes
1answer
90 views
can we prohibit erasure of comments?
comments often respond to other comments. if the latter are deleted, the former make no sense. my view is that once you've said it, you should be prepared to take the consequences. erasure of ...
6
votes
0answers
46 views
'Missing context' close reason: remove 'other details'?
We currently have a close reason that was originally intended for zero-effort homework and now reads:
This question is missing context or other details. Please improve the question by providing ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views
Updating Philosophy.SE practices to allow for Rebuttals and edits
I would like to offer a suggestion to improve the Standard Practices for administration of the Philosophy.SE.
I see that it is not irregular for hasty down-votes and closes, and that this is causing ...
3
votes
0answers
28 views
Can we add options to closing questions as off-topic when the question belongs on another SE site besides our own Meta?
Many questions asked on Phil SE seem to be better fits for other SE sites, e.g. Math, Physics, Biology, Cognitive Sciences, History, Law, Skeptics, sometimes even Sci-Fi/Fantasy or Worldbuilding. ...
0
votes
1answer
16 views
Has anyone asked for a “suggest edit” button, or is the rollback feature enough?
I would like to edit e.g. this, but it seems a bit impertinent when the asker is active, as well as general users with more reputation than me.
Would it be OK to request a "suggest edit" button for ...
6
votes
1answer
61 views
Close reason for 'blatantly off topic' / 'philosophical problem unclear'
We're getting quite some questions that are closed with a custom close reason. Over the past 90 days, we closed 234 questions, 40 (17%) with a custom reason. Looking through the list of custom close ...
2
votes
1answer
19 views
Is there some more compelling way we can invite people to search for duplicate questions?
I think newcomers miss out on a lot of good existing answers because we don't rather forcefully suggest they look for duplicates when they ask a question.
How good is the question search, and could ...
-4
votes
2answers
92 views
Policing overzealous members and moderators
We should aim for meritocracy but encourage participation and discourage demeaning action (downvotes) which drives away participants.
Those voting 68.26% or more in either direction should be ...
-2
votes
1answer
58 views
Should downvotes be justified? [duplicate]
This is a group of philosophy. Made by and for philosophers. Philosophy means a taste, a fondness for knowledge; a will to go out and seek knowledge.
So, if someone downvotes the question or answer ...
14
votes
5answers
347 views
Subjective Questions: Deciding what we want as a community
Introduction
Greeting, fellow lovers of wisdom!
I apologize for the length, but this is an important topic that has come up repeatedly, one that has never been completely addressed, and I feel the ...
0
votes
1answer
22 views
no tag present for moral philosophy
I wanted to place a tag equivalent to "moral philosophy" on my question, but there was none. I used "practical-ethics", but I do not feel ethics is the same as moral philosophy. Though it is similar, ...
3
votes
1answer
17 views
Starring an Answer
Is it possible? Why not? I would like to star one for bookmarking. It is very much down below original question so it will be much easier to just star an answer.
0
votes
1answer
29 views
Is the comment privilege (i.e. needing to earn rep in order to comment) useful?
I suppose that privileges are no concern of moderators, and that therefore nobody from philosophy.se can change anything about that, but I was wondering if getting the privilege to comment that late ...
0
votes
0answers
30 views
what about a debating stackexchange?
I would love a debating site from stackexchange. If there is one already can you point it out?
That would be very addicting. A site that has subcategories, like debate philosophy, debate history, ...
4
votes
2answers
40 views
Site-specific badge conditions?
EDIT: I asked this question on the StackOverflow Meta.
I recently took a look at the badges overview and it seems to me that a lot of the gold badges are literally or nearly impossible to earn on ...
5
votes
2answers
59 views
Retracting a close vote?
Is there any way to retract a close vote? I know that you can get rid of downvotes (and upvotes, for that matter), if the post has been edited. In fact, I recently made a trivial edit (adding a comma ...
3
votes
5answers
158 views
Can't we come up with a 404 philosopun?
Many SE sites have a funny 404 page. We don't.
Can't we come up with some philosopun for the 404 page?
2
votes
1answer
43 views
Should questions on Zen thinking be allowed in philosophy.stackexchange?
According to many famous practitioners and writers of Zen, Zen is not strictly a philosophy in the sense of the word.
There is something extra-logical about the nature of Zen thinking.
However, ...
0
votes
1answer
36 views
I request being able to give bonuses to answerers using my credits, if they have outstanding answers [closed]
It would be nice to be able to spend your credits rewarding those who go above and beyond answering questions, or to reward runners-up to the best answer. I've had some amazingly helpful people tell ...
5
votes
0answers
46 views
One-boxing for the SEP in our chat?
SEP doesn't seem to have an API, so presumably the integration would be somewhat 'messy' (involve scraping the page) -- but this would be a really nice-to-have feature in our stack's chat space. A few ...
3
votes
0answers
277 views
Resources to get started on Philosophy
I want to know if there is a possibility of having a sort of list of resources to get started on philosophy, both in general (which is what I am interested in right now) and in particular themes. I ...
2
votes
0answers
62 views
Please introduce $LaTeX$ to Philosophy SE [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
LateX/WebteX availability?
It would really be helpful to have it in discussions concerning formal logic. Here's the most recent example I know of where it would be helpful:
&...
5
votes
1answer
84 views
Why is there a “Philosophy” tag?
I just noticed that there are 7 questions tagged with philosophy. Is it just me, or is this a terribly ambiguous tag? Should this tag not be removed, so that all questions will have at least a ...
3
votes
2answers
60 views
Can someone who knows edit the “logic” tag wiki?
A questioner asked why reason is mapped to logic. Now I'm wondering the same thing. I think the easiest way to clear up the confusion is if someone in the know would edit the tag wiki to clear ...
17
votes
3answers
282 views
Can we modify the site's short description?
At http://stackexchange.com/sites, the short description under Philosophy is "Q&A for those interested in logical reasoning". I think this is somewhat misleading and diverts potential traffic away ...
2
votes
1answer
80 views
Unifying “this site is for…” descriptions?
After updating the FAQ, our 'this site is about...' description no longer matches the global SE site description (that has been with us since Area 51.) I would like to get all of them saying the same ...
2
votes
1answer
44 views
Is it useful to have a word limit on comments? [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
Can we allow more space and possibly a larger font for comments?
I was asking myself... Very often comments to questions/answers are used to in-depth analyze claims and ...
2
votes
2answers
72 views
Is there any way to make tags of proper names capitalized?
On StackOverflow and many of the other StackExchange sites, it makes sense to normalize tags to all lower case since there's no real distinction between, Perl and perl. (Some would argue there is a ...
1
vote
1answer
37 views
Could we get certain tags to link to Wikipedia in their wiki summaries?
I notice that many, if not all of the tags that so far exist have excellent associated Wikipedia articles. Would it make sense, or is it even possible, to automatically poll information about the ...
-2
votes
1answer
74 views
Can we allow more space and possibly a larger font for comments?
(Good) Philosophical arguments are essentially back and forth exchanges of long, coherent and self-sufficient arguments. Thus, I think the character limit on comments is not enough for proper ...
25
votes
4answers
485 views
LateX/WebteX availability?
My computer savvy is minimal - so I don't really know who to address regarding this - but I think philosophy ought to have LateX availability in text input, because there are going to be a lot of ...
15
votes
1answer
131 views
Can we change the “Subjective and Argumentative” close reason to “Not Constructive”?
Several people, both in the formative phase of this site and more recently, have expressed varying degrees of confusion, consternation, and irony over the fact that one of our close reasons is labeled ...
