Skip to main content
added link and grammar
Source Link
Frank Hubeny
  • 19.8k
  • 1
  • 10
  • 15

I asked the question "Why does Nietzsche think pain has value?"Why does Nietzsche think pain has value?" and cited a quote from The Gay ScienceThe Gay Science. I have edited the title to narrow the object to just psychic pain. As well, I have added a furtherance of my question, specifically noting my inability to understand NietzscheNietzsche's rationale for considering suffering as something great, or, as I believe is equivocal, why pain is of value.

The question has received up votes since the edit, while it has been on hold, so that leads me to believe I am on the appropriate track. My question here is what else does my post need to be taken off this hold?

I asked the question "Why does Nietzsche think pain has value?" and cited a quote from The Gay Science. I have edited the title to narrow the object to just psychic pain. As well, I have added a furtherance of my question, specifically noting my inability to understand Nietzsche rationale for considering suffering as something great, or, as I believe is equivocal, why pain is of value.

The question has received up votes since the edit, while it has been on hold, so that leads me to believe I am on the appropriate track. My question here is what else does my post need to be taken off this hold?

I asked the question "Why does Nietzsche think pain has value?" and cited a quote from The Gay Science. I have edited the title to narrow the object to just psychic pain. As well, I have added a furtherance of my question, specifically noting my inability to understand Nietzsche's rationale for considering suffering as something great, or, as I believe is equivocal, why pain is of value.

The question has received up votes since the edit, while it has been on hold, so that leads me to believe I am on the appropriate track. My question here is what else does my post need to be taken off this hold?

Source Link

Does my question still need revision?

I asked the question "Why does Nietzsche think pain has value?" and cited a quote from The Gay Science. I have edited the title to narrow the object to just psychic pain. As well, I have added a furtherance of my question, specifically noting my inability to understand Nietzsche rationale for considering suffering as something great, or, as I believe is equivocal, why pain is of value.

The question has received up votes since the edit, while it has been on hold, so that leads me to believe I am on the appropriate track. My question here is what else does my post need to be taken off this hold?