Timeline for Are amateur users that have little knowledge about philosophy not "ideal" for philosophy.SE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 17, 2012 at 21:59 | vote | accept | Outlier | ||
| Mar 17, 2012 at 21:58 | comment | added | Outlier | @stoicfury thanks a lot for the answer. Very encouraging and inspiring! | |
| Mar 17, 2012 at 5:15 | comment | added | commando | Hear hear! I can confirm this from experience. I (an amateur user) have answered several questions from scratch (such as this one). Before it I had never even heard of anything I was talking about in my answer, but it all made sense when I read about it and made the connections! | |
| Mar 17, 2012 at 1:17 | history | answered | stoicfuryMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |