Timeline for Would it be better to show some amount of humbleness considering close votes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:42 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/ with https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 24, 2016 at 12:22 | vote | accept | Philip KlöckingMod | ||
| Aug 22, 2016 at 20:37 | answer | added | Joseph WeissmanMod | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 21, 2016 at 16:05 | comment | added | user2953 | As for the question you linked now: I agree that this shouldn't be closed. You are right in saying that the definition close reason only makes sense if there are articles about it available. The close reason was removed, if I remember correctly because it was applied in cases like this. | |
| Aug 21, 2016 at 0:01 | history | edited | Philip KlöckingMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 384 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 23:41 | history | edited | Philip KlöckingMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 876 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2016 at 10:47 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhilosophy/status/765862694960365568 | ||
| Aug 16, 2016 at 21:12 | answer | added | commandoMod | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 14:36 | answer | added | user2953 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | user2953 | Your first linked question has only one close vote at the moment, are you sure that's correct? | |
| Aug 16, 2016 at 10:36 | history | edited | Philip KlöckingMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 10:15 | history | edited | Philip KlöckingMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Aug 16, 2016 at 10:08 | history | asked | Philip KlöckingMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |