1

I think that too many answers are written in the glib and deathly prose of LLM to keep using this site in goodwill. When someone shows a lack of insight into the question but a verbose and ultimately peculiar knowledge of primary literature, then I cannot really believe that anyone who finds philosophy so easy would deliberately say so much irrelevant nonsense. A simple fix would be demand quotes from 2ndary sources and downvote anything that is flimsily related to the question. Until then, this site is morbid.

7
  • 1
    CGPT was released a year ago. How do you account for all the deadly regurgitative answers submitted before? Jan 9 at 7:41
  • 1
    Can you provide examples of any such posts? Jan 12 at 5:50
  • There has been plenty of discussion on Meta Stack Exchange about policies regarding AI-generated content. Jan 12 at 5:51
  • 1
    Yes, please provide a link to even one example.
    – Scott Rowe
    Jan 13 at 2:32
  • I'm not being disingenuous @ScottRowe - the last one I tried to point out felt insulted, so I don't know.
    – user70707
    Jan 13 at 3:01
  • 1
    Ok, but you seem upset ('morbid' is a strong word) so I wondered if I could help.
    – Scott Rowe
    Jan 13 at 3:03
  • ah, i often am eh @ScottRowe
    – user70707
    Jan 13 at 3:35

0

You must log in to answer this question.