Here I ask a question about the geneology which tries to understand why I should accept the argument style. The question is about nietzsche's "aphoristic" style, which Cody Gray has said "would be a very nice question".
I don't understand the "would be". This is my question--- how am I supposed to read a non-acadmic argument with supposed academic conclusions? I have no idea, and I got some responses about various philosopher's grappling with nietzsche's style. But I didn't get a satisfactory answer because the question was closed.
I am annoyed that questions which are definite are closed--- I asked about a specific argument in nietzsche, and I got one answer and one attempted answer before the close, and the close was by a person who has expressed hostility towards my questions before.
I will ask that it be reopened--- there is nothing wrong or vague about this question, and nothing offensive in the body.