Thread in question Are Laws crafted around personal/individual beliefs ethical?
I had made edits prior to the On-Hold notice broadening the range of the question on ethics form being about a single purpose to a general idea and asking how different fields/viewpoints more would categorize this ethically.
I do not see how this is off-topic.
Also the description in the on-hold is patently false. No where in the question do I denote a personal philosophy nor am I expecting a certain answer. The only personnal philosophy is the answerer who did not answer the question instead goes on about Gender-Roles in a manner that I disagreed with and completely misrepresents kirkegaards viewpoints on ethics as a cliffnote at that.
I do not see how a question about the ethics of a general principle is off topic or unanswerable. Also addendum question, As noted in the conversation in the referenced answer am I not supposed to tell an answerer I disagree with them and refute any counter point that I also disagree with?. This is a genuine question I do not know if there are any guidelines on the length or irreconcilable differences.
Again despite the answer the question is not about the role of gender roles in society