There's a couple posts on the SE, one of which I've closed and one of which I left open. I think it might be good to have a uniform policy for this type. Below here's the example of what it is:
I've seen lots of very bad criticisms of Objectivism, but I haven't found a good refutation (I've looked). Rand's opponent's all seem to be grossly ignorant of her positions, and generally seem to want to ignore Rand and are unwilling to have discussions. Does anyone know of a detailed refutation of Objectivism covering some major parts (not just a detail) which is not itself already refuted by a published non-refuted criticism?
Please provide a link or cite, not an ad hoc essay of your own devising.
The basic pattern is X is right, please provide a "detailed refutation of X ... which is not already refuted by a published non-refuted criticism."