-4

This question already has an answer here:

I think it makes no sense to say that no one is doing philosophy here, I think it is hypocritical. How can you talk about philosophy without "doing" it?

I think that there should be more weight on avoiding original research and a lot less on "not doing philosophy".

Now, if I was being downvoted (yay!) for only asking questions that you didn't know any research on, that would be diffferent.

marked as duplicate by stoicfury Mar 14 '15 at 19:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 4
    What do you hold to be the difference between "original research" and "doing philosophy"? You want more emphasis on one and less on the other, yet those concepts seem the same to me. – stoicfury Mar 10 '15 at 17:53
  • they're not identical tho are they, i can do original research into literature e.g.. AND my point was that YOU HAVE TO DO PHILOSOPHY TO READ AND UNDERSTAND IT. – user6917 Mar 10 '15 at 18:05
  • 2
    Perhaps you could clarify yourself by providing some examples. Also, the first paragraph of this question seems to be a different question from the title, and would belong on the main site (if anywhere). What exactly is your question? – Keelan Mar 10 '15 at 18:23
  • ok to follow an argument about say kant you have to reproduce it without just verbal comprehension in the same way that you can know what notes are played without understanding music – user6917 Mar 11 '15 at 13:29
  • 2
0

I read that philosophy is the search for truth. If posing questions is a means to search for truth it is philosophy. So a site dedicated to asking and answering questions is philosophy, at least philosophical enquiry.

My reference is Aristotle. I hope he qualifies as a useful source....

  • yeah i tend to agree, sorry :D ! – user6917 Mar 14 '15 at 7:09
-2

"the question is not grounded in philosophy enough to be a good fit; we like questions that reference specific expertise rather than simple generate a long list of opinions."

I have little to add to this response from a stoic, to another question; make of it what you will.