Why rules of this site, according to which questions are handled by moderators (evaluated, put on hold and get closed ), are constructed that way, that they are favoring trivialization and oversimplification of the philosophy ?
PS Since this site allows only questions and disallows critical statements - I am dressing my critique into the veiled clothes of the question ...
PPS Philosophy, by definition, is: "The study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence".
Philosophy utilizes abstraction ("formation of recognizing some set of common features in individual phenomena, and on that basis forming a concept of that feature") as one of its most important tools.
Philosophy, therefore, is highly sophisticated and complicated thought process and it deals with very broad and deep problems.
Philosophy differs from other disciplines, which have one established commonly recognized academic approach. Instead of dominating, commonly recognized approach, - there are many contradicting philosophical views and assumptions, and each of them has the right to exist and be discussed.
That is why philosophical questions could not be fit into Procrustean bed of set of narrow rules and be put on hold and closed as "too broad", "opinion based", "based on personal philosophy", etc.