I was browsing through the search results for 'evil' when I came across Is it possible to scientifically determine good and evil? Today, I asked How could 'objective morality' be known/investigated?, which seems to have some distinctive overlap. In particular, I suggested a science-like research project into objective morality. Anyhow, I have no idea about what is proper in terms of cross-posting (with edits) my answer into said good & evil post vs. just commenting and linking to mine, vs. doing none of the above.
Are there some general guidelines? I'm a systematic thinker, so I tend to tie a bunch of different closely related ideas together. I can see myself doing a bit of cross-linking of questions/answers (this doesn't seem to be supported all that well with SE, as tags don't always cut it), if that's kosher.
Edit: To clarify a bit, here's how the situation might seem to an outsider.
Here is this guy, and he thinks his answers are awesome. He's referencing them from a several places that don't really seem to match the question. It seems like he is just trying to give his answers lots of exposure, to have more opportunities for upvotes.